Heat and power consumption

  1. So.

    Paranoid blather aside (note sig), how do Intel's current chips rate against PPC for power consumption and heat output per performance unit? Roughly?

    -zoara-

    6th June 2005: Hell freezes over.

  2. Oooh.

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000157045779/

    PPC = 15 integer performance units per watt
    Intel = 70 ipu/watt

    Sound reasonable? Sounds like nonsense to me.

    -z-

    6th June 2005: Hell freezes over.

  3. Previously, zoara wrote:

    PPC = 15 integer performance units per watt Intel = 70 ipu/watt

    Sound reasonable? Sounds like nonsense to me.

    Same nonsense that Steve was quoting in the Keynote - why do you think that it's nonsense?

    It's the reason you don't have a G5 Boko.

    Martin

  4. Maybe it's the flops per watt that Apple have been relying on.

    Pd

  5. Turns out it was something Jobs said, but I suspect half a dozen of you have pointed that out while I've been offline... ;)

    Any meaningful comparisons anywhere?

    -z-

    6th June 2005: Hell freezes over.

  6. PPC puts out five times the heat of Intel? That's why I think it's nonsense. Though I suppose as it doesn't specify *which* chips from each family, it could be a comparison between G5 and Pentium M...

    -z-

    6th June 2005: Hell freezes over.

Power Manager - Mac automation and energy saving software for Mac OS X

Download a free demonstration of Power Manager today and start saving.